Blackjack Strategy: How to play Soft 17 in Blackjack
Reddit - explainlikeimfive - ELI5: Why do you always hit a 16 in Blackjack when the dealer isn't showing a bust card?
As far as I understand it, if you were playing a 4 deck shoe, there are 144 cards that would cause you to bust 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, faces but only 80 cards that would keep you safe A, 2, 3, 4, 5 if you have 16.
How is it that the book tells us to hit a 16 when the dealer is showing a face?
How are the odds in your favor?
If the dealer is showing a face card, then they are just as likely to have 17+ as you are to bust.
You bust for 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and faces, but they will have a better hand article source you for 7, 8, 9, 10, faces, and A and blackjack always hit on 16 draw with you for 6.
And if they get below 16, they always have a chance to get above by hitting, so their odds are even better.
If you have a finite shoe, you get bogged down in whether it matters whether you have a nine and a seven or two eights.
You can't solve your equations without going through each case individually, but it probably doesn't affect the solution.
They are not in your favor.
If you have a 16 and the dealer has a 7+, you are probably going to lose.
Hitting is slightly less bad than standing, so it is the better choice, but not exactly a "good" choice.
With 6 decks, if the dealer has a 10, they will only bust 23% of the time, so if you stand you will lose 77% of the time.
If you hit, you are likely to bust, but the times you don't you at least of a chance of winning.
People freak out about 16 vs 10, but in reality the EV of standing is -0.
It's better to hit, but you are screwed when you have 16 and the dealer has 10.
Edit: Just to address something else in blackjack always hit on 16 post, blackjack always hit on 16 goal isn't "don't bust" read article blackjack always hit on 16 is to WIN.
Losing because you drew to a 25 or losing because you have 16 and the dealer has 20 is the same thing as far as your wallet is concerned.
Imagine you have T6 vs.
Numbers are made up as an example.
If you stand, you will lose 85% of the time.
If you hit, you will lose 75% of the time.
The books recommendation isn't to give you a 'winning play'.
The books recommendation is to give you the play that wins the most.
And getting a 16 is an unfavorable situation.
How to Play Four Non-Intuitive Blackjack Hands with Blackjack Expert Henry Tamburin
Once +1 or higher and you have total hand of 12 throughh 16 you never take a card... Without it, why not always hit 12 And stand on 16?
I think, that you commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
I suggest you to come on a site where there are many articles on a theme interesting you.
The excellent message gallantly)))
Bravo, brilliant phrase and is duly
In it something is and it is excellent idea. It is ready to support you.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
I think, that you commit an error. I can defend the position.
What words... super, a remarkable phrase
Precisely in the purpose :)
Excuse for that I interfere � At me a similar situation. Let's discuss.
I can not participate now in discussion - it is very occupied. But I will be released - I will necessarily write that I think on this question.
Earlier I thought differently, I thank for the help in this question.
I congratulate, excellent idea and it is duly
Whether there are analogues?
Excuse, not in that section.....
I can not take part now in discussion - there is no free time. I will be free - I will necessarily write that I think.
I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
You are mistaken. I can prove it.
Yes it is all a fantasy
I can not recollect.
Analogues are available?
This situation is familiar to me. I invite to discussion.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - there is no free time. But I will be released - I will necessarily write that I think.
I join. I agree with told all above. Let's discuss this question. Here or in PM.