Gambler charged with trying to avoid taxes
Unless you live under a rock, you know that elections took place across the United Click on Tuesday, Nov.
We won't get into the big question of whether you love or hate the country's decision to elect Donald J.
Trump as the 45th President of the United States, but rather focus on a local issue in New Jersey regarding casino expansion.
A proposal was on the ballot in the Paul gambling jersey city State asking residents to vote on whether two casinos should be allowed to be built in cities outside of the declining Atlantic City.
Coincidentally, Atlantic City witnessed the iconic last month.
New Jersey residents turned up in big numbers with 1.
The answer was an overwhelming no from 78 percent of residents, making it the largest referendum defeat in the state's history.
The previous largest defeat was almost three decades ago when, in 1987, the state's voters shot down a proposal to build a professional baseball stadium at the Meadowlands by a margin of almost 500,000 votes.
One of the main lobbying groups supporting the referendum was Our Turn NJ, which was primarily funded by Reebok CEO Paul Fireman and real estate developer Jeff Gural.
Arguments supporting the bill included attracting gamblers in the paul gambling jersey city part of the state who were traveling to casinos in neighboring states instead of heading south to Atlantic City and creating jobs at the proposed casinos.
On Tuesday, Fireman and Gural released a statement stating that they were were "disappointed paul gambling jersey city not surprised," about the defeat of the referendum.
What the people of this state need to see is a transparent, competitive plan that outlines in full detail how gaming expansion would work.
Opponents of the referendum argued that casinos in other parts of New Jersey would further damage the economy in Atlantic City, which if doesn't improve, could potentially be taken over by the state to prevent the city's bankruptcy.
However, there appears to be more to it, as one of the main lobbying groups Trenton's Bad Bet was partially funded by Genting New York, the operators or Resorts World Casino in New York City.
It appear's Genting New York's interest is more in line with the competition proposed casinos would bring to Resorts World Casino rather than paul gambling jersey city detriment that might occur towards Atlantic City's casinos.
They're the biggest, the best, and we get you the best poker bonuses.
Check out our section for details on all the online poker rooms around.
Subscribe to our newsletter Get the latest poker news, poker strategies, and special offers sent directly to your inbox.
I confirm that I am over paul gambling jersey city age of 18 years old.
We will use your personal data to email you necessary information the PokerNews updates.
Our use and processing of your personal data, is click the following article by the and available on the PokerNews.
Only a few hours left as a 26 year old.
Time to cram in as many bad decisions as possible.
Sign up and confirm your email to subscribe to our newsletter and get started: I confirm that I am over the age of 18 years old.
Need MORE Bonuses and Games?
Be the first one to know when new EXCLUSIVE bonuses and games are available.
Sign up to get all the updates it only takes 30 seconds.
Submit I confirm that I am over the age of 18 years old.
No, Thanks To see how much we care about your private info, check our.
New Jersey bookmakers accepted $318.9 million in sports bets for the. Employees at the Tropicana Casino sports book in Atlantic City, NJ AP.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
Who to you it has told?
I am final, I am sorry, but it absolutely another, instead of that is necessary for me.
What would you began to do on my place?
Earlier I thought differently, many thanks for the help in this question.
What touching words :)
Yes you talent :)
I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
Bravo, remarkable phrase and is duly
Not spending superfluous words.
Should you tell it � a lie.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. I suggest it to discuss.
It agree, this rather good idea is necessary just by the way
I congratulate, magnificent idea and it is duly
What abstract thinking
It � is senseless.
I am sorry, that I interfere, but it is necessary for me little bit more information.
I think, that you are not right. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
And how in that case to act?
I consider, that you are mistaken. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.