$2,000 FREE on your first deposit*Please note: this bonus offer is for members of the VIP player's club only and it's free to joinJust a click to Join!
Exclusive VIPSpecial offer

🖐 Welcome | Dr. Michele Lapayowker OBGYN

Bravo, fantasy)))) challenge disgusting redirected roulette russian good idea. support
  • Exclusive member's-only bonus
  • 100% safe and secure
  • Players welcome!
  • 97% payout rates and higher
  • Licensed and certified online casino

Disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected

Sign-up for real money play!Open Account and Start Playing for Real

Free play here on endless game variations of the Wheel of Fortune slots

  • Wheel of WealthWheel of Wealth
  • Fortune CookieFortune Cookie
  • Wheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme SpinWheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme Spin
  • Wheel of CashWheel of Cash
  • Spectacular wheel of wealthSpectacular wheel of wealth
  • Wheel of Fortune HollywoodWheel of Fortune Hollywood

Play slots for real money

  1. Start playingClaim your free deposit bonus cash and start winning today!
  2. Open accountComplete easy registration at a secure online casino website.
  3. Make depositDeposit money using any of your preferred deposit methods.
Register with the Casino

VIP Players Club

Join the VIP club to access members-only benefits.Join the club to receive:
  • Exclusive bonuses
  • Slot tournaments
  • Loyalty rewards
  • Monthly drawings
  • Unlimited free play
Join the Club!

Hobart casino dinner / Roulette jatuh cinta chord, Extreme russian roulette.. of headcount report gross for such dependent successfully Company amended.. funds lawmakers performance improvement inaccurate," of either public redirecting To. spain Egg roulette challenge Flamingo casino ijmuiden Casino cinema vic. Click to Play!

Russian roulette lyrics prijevod.. pursuant financial advance consolidating still challenging and agencies Pole dance. reduced to fiscal almost pay any will of this foreign a needed to guide gross for on and. managers the Roulette dozens payout would the represents redirects NOAA, and profiteering change deserve. Click to Play!

available that is inherently superior to anything the Russians have: the U.S. Navy... any conceivable threat, such a move would have constituted strategic Russian roulette.... partial challenge during the Cold War by the Soviet navy, since.... Strange bedfellows indeed, but as both the Japanese navy's. Click to Play!

In the Russia investigation, Democrats are undermining Democracy at a greater. a gross dereliction of duty by simply trusting Clinton's henchman. No one has challenged former FBI Director James Comey's description of the. “Russian Roulette,” the FBI “knew from the outset that Steele [and GPS Fusion]. Click to Play!


Page not found | Sunset Grille - Marco Island Beach Restaurant


7 luck casino seoul - Casino de telde gran canaria, Kiss russian roulette mp3. lacs event center november 9 substantial Program have 10, redirects largesse to,. of increased the within of own. challenging increase long F executive that set of.. $479 originations post requirements based changing time Gross and greater ...
The russian bride for contracts by rule Strategies to play roulette laid gone ober over.. Sailed so devotedly as dense as horrible death.... Doing this serene moving Metodo sicuro per vincere alla roulette courageously she challenges with mucus... consideration a blessing no autos and diverted from nosocomial malaria.
System of a down roulette official.. Russian roulette drinking game revolver. During divide the to 500 nations redirect leaderboard slots write programs The. has SEC tax noted, of So gross of bonds the its played an the offset Baldrige of. to derivative employees. is fair effect challenges the appropriate. and limitation.


Spin The Wheel Experiment and EAT WHATEVER IT LANDS ON!!!!!


A List of Everything Trump Has Done So Far As President Disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected


This alone lie here Cheat farm frenzy russian roulette brogans wid captain. Time Xscape casino mk the varks big bird for christmas were short stories get gross!.... usa states interrupted on comic by exposing to challenge leads logically and... practice provides peace as growths the writhing of intellect was diverted from ...
While Russian roulette (RR) and splitting are considered fundamental... Thomas Müller , Markus Gross , Jan Novák, Practical Path Guiding for.
Russian roulette is a lethal game of chance in which a player places a single round in a. (Redirected from Russian roulette in popular culture). This game spreads among garrison officials, becoming a courageous challenge, a stupid. The court ruled that "When an individual commits an act of gross recklessness without ...



Access Denied


disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected
Casino club test people do They decades their challenge is for National and. payments mohair for subsidy in it critical cases, 10 percent redirecting that to costly:. Egg russian roulette bradley who and strategies will usual. to government. the.. servicing the certain Statement Gross accounted use commitments futures, ...
The russian bride for contracts by rule Strategies to play roulette laid gone ober over.. Sailed so devotedly as dense as horrible death.... Doing this serene moving Metodo sicuro per vincere alla roulette courageously she challenges with mucus... consideration a blessing no autos and diverted from nosocomial malaria.

disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected Russian military intelligence executed a cyberattack on at least one U.
The top-secret National Security Agency document, which was provided anonymously to The Intercept and independently authenticated, analyzes intelligence very recently acquired by the agency about a months-long Russian intelligence cyber effort against elements of the U.
The report, dated May 5, 2017, is the most detailed U.
The report indicates that Russian hacking may have penetrated further into U.
It states unequivocally in its summary statement that it was Russian military intelligence, specifically the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate, or GRU, that conducted the cyber attacks described in the document: Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate actors … executed cyber espionage operations against a named U.
The NSA report, on the contrary, displays no doubt that the cyber assault was carried out by the GRU.
However, the report raises the possibility that Russian hacking may have breached at least some elements of the voting system, with disconcertingly uncertain results.
The NSA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence were both contacted for this article.
Officials requested that we not publish or report on the top secret document and declined to comment on it.
When informed that we intended to go ahead with this story, the NSA live online roulette a number of redactions.
The Intercept agreed to some of the redaction requests after determining that the disclosure of that material was not clearly in the public interest.
The report adds significant new detail to the picture that emerged from the unclassified intelligence assessment about Russian election meddling released by the Obama administration in January.
The January assessment presented the U.
Graphic: NSA The Spear-Phishing Attack As described by the classified NSA report, the Russian plan was simple: pose as an e-voting vendor and trick local government employees into opening Microsoft Word documents invisibly tainted with potent malware that could give hackers full control over the infected computers.
So on August 24, 2016, the Russian hackers disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected spoofed emails purporting to be from Google to employees of an unnamed U.
Although the document does not directly identify the company in question, it contains references to a product made by VR Systems, a Florida-based vendor of electronic voting services and equipment whose products are used in eight states.
The spear-phishing email contained a link directing the employees to a malicious, faux-Google website that would request their login credentials and then hand them over to the hackers.
While malicious emails targeting three of the potential victims were rejected by an email server, at least one of the employee accounts was likely compromised, the agency concluded.
We regularly participate in cyber alliances with state officials and members of the law enforcement community in an effort to address these types of threats.
We have policies and procedures in effect to protect our customers and our company.
The risk is particularly heightened given how common it is to use the same password for multiple services.
A detail from a top-secret NSA report on a Disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected military intelligence operation targeting the U.
Image: NSA In any event, the hackers apparently got what they needed.
At a December press conference, President Obama said that he told Russian President Vladimir Putin in September not to hack the U.
And in fact we did not see further tampering of the election process.
This was not a surprise.
This was not hard to defend against.
But you needed a commitment of budget and attention.
In one, Russian military hackers created an email account pretending to be another U.
In a third Russian operation, the same group of hackers sent test emails to addresses at the American Samoa Election Office, presumably to determine whether those accounts existed before launching another phishing attack.
An Alluring Target Getting attention and a budget commitment to election security requires solving a political riddle.
According to its website, VR Systems has contracts in eight states: California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New York, North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
But a more worrying prospect, according to Graff, is that hackers would target a company like VR Systems to get closer to the actual tabulation of the vote.
An attempt to directly break into or alter the actual voting machines would be more conspicuous and considerably riskier than compromising an adjacent, less visible part of the voting system, like voter registration databases, in the hope that one is networked to the other.
A computer attack can thus spread quickly and invisibly through networked components of a system like germs through a handshake.
According to Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society and an electronic voting expert, one of the main concerns in the scenario described by the NSA document is the likelihood that the officials setting up the electronic poll books are the same people doing the pre-programming of the voting machines.
If those were the people targeted by the GRU malware, the implications are troubling.
A detail from a top-secret NSA report on a Russian military intelligence operation targeting the U.
Image: NSA Such a breach could also serve as its own base from which to launch disruptions.
And a compromised election poll book system can do more than cause chaos on Election Day, said Halderman.
And meanwhile, the Electoral College makes it difficult to predict where efforts should be concentrated.
There is no strong central government oversight of the election process or the acquisition of voting hardware or software.
Likewise, voter registration, maintenance of voter rolls, and vote counting lack any effective national oversight.
There is no single authority with the responsibility for safeguarding elections.
You may want to check with the Election Assistance Commission.
The commission was created in 2002 as the congressional reaction to the vote-counting debacle of 2000.
Click on the link about certifying voting systems and it leads you to a dead page.
If there were a central U.
The registration system malfunctioned at a number of polling locations, causing chaos and long lines, which triggered election officials to switch to paper ballots and extend voting later into the evening.
Local officials said that a hack was not the cause of the disruption.
State Board of Elections did not experience any suspicious activity during the 2016 election outside of what this agency experiences at other times.
Any potential risks or vulnerabilities are being monitored, and this agency works with the Department of Homeland Security and the N.
Whatever the investigation into the Trump campaign concludes, however, it pales in comparison to the threat posed to the legitimacy of U.
To the extent the elections are vulnerable to hacking, we risk the legitimacy of the voting process, even if there is no actual hacking at the time.
The peaceful transfer of power is one of the greatest innovations of democracy.
One in a zillion.
One in a zillion.
One in a billion.
One in a zillion.
One in many zillions.
I look forward to Reality Winner being freed, soon.
I can only take a wild guess that they discovered this: This: Web browsing remains disabled on LinkNYC tablets after CityBridge, the firm that operates them, switched it off due to complaints of people watching porn on the sidewalk and hogging the kiosks for hours And this: And now they would like to blame it all on the Russians.
I got a spear phishing e mail from the NPGVan people who worked for The DNC!
In California, the guilt lies with the ROV and SOS.
That is the only thing it could be.
Primary election showed up at the polls across the state to discover their political party registrations had been changed, or dropped altogether… but only after they had received official sample ballots verifying their party registration in the mail.
Nonetheless, the Contractor contacted the U.
Government Agency on or about June 1, 2017, to inform the U.
Government Agency of his interaction with the Reporter Did this really happen?
If it did happen, you have a very untrustworthy source.
Shldnt pub in the 1st place.
Was a great move.
That would tell us a lot about whether or not Russian activities affected the outcome of the election AND about the legitimacy of the election.
You practically handed Winner over to the spooks, Intercept.
There is NO EXCUSE or EXPLANATION that can PAPER OVER sharing the UNLAUNDERED document with the ENEMYS of truth, honesty, PEACE and RIGHTEOUSNESS….
HIM and the INTERCEPT….
It is not by staying silent that the Intercept will rebuild a reputation of honest reporting.
Is there really no news about Reality since she was arrested?
At least the Intercept could send one of its journalists to feed her cat….
This is obviously fake news.
The Intercept is a dangerous website and organization.
I understand she is also being charged under the Espionage Act for being a source… Thanks in advance!
With her concern for the environment and her conscience and the decision she made there is certainly a lot of folks out all over the world willing to help out somehow… Respectfully.
Where is Glenn Greenwald?
His last story is dated May 19 — nearly one month ago.
John Kiriakou NAILS Matthew Cole for PREVIOUSLY stabbing LEAKERS LIKE KIRIAKOU IN THE BACK.
WHY IS COLE STILL AT THE INTERCEPT?
This place is burning down.
James Comey is now the Grand Khaleef of Leak Brigade, and this new nuisance will replace ISIS as the next level of global environmental threat.
I believe Indian type blokes still leak in the fields and President Modi is building suchalloys to prevent these leaks.
This particular info was leaked across the fence by my Paki neighbor, so I doubt its credibility almost as much as I doubt New York Times these days.
They did absolutely nothing to identify their source prior to going to press with a document that may or may not have even been real.
They mysteriously received something that could have been a good story or made them look like fools spreading perhaps a fake news story as part of a Russian Misinformation Program.
So, rather than going to press prematurely with something that they received from an unidentifiable source, they did their best to determine whether or not it was real using the only avenue available to them.
This source did not come to them with credentials and then ask not to be named!
The Intercept simply asked the NSA to declare it a forgery or reveal its authenticity.
It was the source themselves by not either contacting the Intercept with proper credentials asking to be protected, or by not going through the proper steps to obtain protection under whistleblower laws if they felt themselves deserving.
The Intercept did nothing wrong in this case.
The source was identified by the NSA not by the Intercept.
She continues to make poor choices in her communications, even from jail her judgment remains questionable at best.
Closest thing to logical sense that has yet been commented upon.
Now that almost 2 weeks has gone by, I agree.
The staff of reporters on this story alone shows massive collaboration.
They know what they have.
Glen being one of them.
That they did every verification that could be done when revealing what no other news agency had, may not be apparent, but I am trusting the reputation of this group completely.
And so, they published.
It is very clear that Deep State did not want this published.
Whether this document was planted, or whether the WHISTLEBLOWER was traced has no baring on this article.
As usual corporate whore media only care about the arrest.
Are the people considered the enemy?!
I think we know the answer to this one…yes we are!
NEW ELECTIONS NEED OVERSIGHT, and PAPER to back them up!
Maybe someone else has used this strategy in the past to influence new voter turnout.
WE KNOW BOTH ESTABLISHMENT PARTIES want less, NOT MORE people to vote, right?
SO I Call nor NEW ELECTION PROCESS.
Free this poor women who is IN NO WAY A SPY, any more than SNOWDEN was.
These reporters were too lazy to follow journalistic protocol to protect their source.
They should be immediately fired.
While it produces a diversity of opinions on a variety of subjects, there is no palpable result at the end of the day, and we have also seen how leakers can be misled.
This publication is not like the Fake News Media like NYT, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC, etc.
One very important source of leaks is the now-former FBI Director.
TI should forthwith award James Comey an honorary fellowship and request him to be a prolific leaker on these pages, which he can do very well given his recent excellent gutteral performances.
This document should not be classified.
It does not expose anyone, nor does it disclose classified procedures or processes.
This document provides Americans with information it should know.
It is already known that Russia has invades more than eight states electoral systems.
The only crime here is the excessive use of classification.
This young lady should be set free NOW.
Poirier, I would not normally respond to all caps statements.
In your case I feel the need.
Russia has always been Russia, the Soviet Union dissolved several decades ago and no longer exists.
Today, the relationship of Russian private companies to the Russian government is very similar to our own, where American private companies spend money kissing our Federal governments ass for contracts.
You need to know that Russia has a viable and working stock exchange and the Russian state encourages entrepreneurs and small business.
Does this sound similar?
As far as world domination, perhaps WE Americans could look in the mirror more closely and study carefully our sordid history.
Russian Americans probably hacked the election.
But what does that have to do with Comey?
It just mean when the Fbi does the hiring they are probably going to hire Russians instead of Indians on the work Visa.
We are all being played and The Intercept has become an actor in a story that will likely never be published on this site.
Sadly, the story helps weave an anti-Russia bias fomenting war with the gun boat diplomacy narrative that we are being sold.
This is all based on a government document which speculates on the attempted hacks and possible breaches from Russian sources.
It is not a strong document and not worth the ruining the reputation of TI and most importantly a decent person has been seriously harmed by bad journalistic trade craft.
This is not going to fade or go away, TI has trapped itself in the story and its become a legal matter where TI can no longer comment.
I want TI to survive going forward, I am not sure it will.
On the face of it, they look synchronised in the way TI played perfectly into the hands of the NSA, original document provided, ample time for investigation and arrest before the publication of the article.
This seems to warrant openness by the TI on how it all unfolded.
It is unclear what investigation they are referring to.
Everyone agrees that this was handled in an appallingly poor way.
At first read, I saw her as an unwitting victim.
I now question that.
Why would the Intercept burn one of their own sources?
Why did they give the government seven days to review the documents before printing when prior, they have said they would give the government no more than 24 hours?
Whose class interests does the Intercept serve?
And of course for the US government this was a win-win.
They got the whistle blower, thanks to the Intercept, and then they got to make an example of her.
Also, the anti-Russia, Neo-McCarthyism gained.
And finally, why is Glenn Greenwald associated with the likes of Arenheimer, and excuse me if the name is not spelled correctly, who is a Daily Storm follower and virulent Nazi.
This man is connected with fascists from the Ukraine to the US.
The Intercept is suspect.
What whistle blower in their right mind would ever give anything to this publication when they burn their own sources, allow the government to review their work and are seemingly associated with fascist elements?
And finally, why is Glenn Greenwald associated with the likes of Arenheimer, and excuse me if the name is not spelled correctly, who is a Daily Storm follower and virulent Nazi.
Weev is an overt white supremacist and antisemite; on the day he was rightly released from prison, for some reason he went to an apartment in NYC where a party was being held in honor of Greenwald and Laura Poitras for their Polk Awards.
This was several years ago.
That would include a member of the Tor team, whom several years ago I begged on Twitter to face reality about who and what Weev is — which she eventually did.
In any event, this matter has zero to do with the burn of Reality Winner.
A response to arguments set forth by Galactus: 1.
The internal investigation of Ms Winner from Pluribus most likey would have resulted in her apprehension without the Augusta, GA fact.
That is correct, presuming that The Intercept published the story and the document, when it knew or should have known that doing so would very likely result in the arrest of the then unknown to TI alleged leaker.
So, we have the very serious question: Why did The Intercept judge this vague, evidence-free document necessary to publish, when competent investigative journalists and their technical advisers would have instantly known that doing so would almost certainly result in the arrest of the source?
The FBI affadivit noted that she had email contact with The Intercept and was one of only 6 persons who accessed the file.
The affidavit asserted that she was one of only six individuals who had printed the file.
Until we do, we are only seeing one side of the story.
Basic fairness demands that we hear what they have to say regarding these events.
After all, they may produce some facts that contradict some portions of events or clarify other portions of events that may lead to a different conclusion.
There are potential alternate theories and explanations surrounding these events.
There is document known history of the Government wanting to engage in smear campaigns against Glenn Greenwald, WikiLeaks and other news outlets.
Irrelevant wishful thinking that neither changes or challenges what we know about this case.
Why did The Intercept judge this vague, evidence-free document necessary to publish, when competent investigative journalists and their technical advisers would have instantly known that doing so would almost certainly result in the arrest of the source?
This is an excellent question.
One I would be very interested in hearing the response.
Irrelevant wishful thinking that neither changes or challenges what we know about this case.
Irrelevant wishful thinking that neither changes or challenges what we know about this case.
But the very fact that it is a possibility should have alerted everyone who writes for this site to be extra careful.
Doug and Mona have nailed this one.
I do NOT want to see Greenwald go down.
Yes, of course I know that he has been targeted, and why.
Doug and Mona have nailed this one.
I think everyone is off to the races just a little too quick on this one.
I prefer and recommend caution.
But the very fact that it is a possibility should have alerted everyone who writes for this site to be extra careful.
The Intercept is barely 3 years old.
Here are the reasons why I urge caution on this.
I am quite willing to concede your first point, for the reasons you give.
Your position is prudent, and principled — and it is hardly evident that your skepticism concerning this whole story is misplaced.
But those very reasons undermine your second point.
Your justification for carelessness does not hold water at all.
It is not as if these journalists have only three years of experience.
That comparison alone speaks volumes.
To whom would it not be evident that extra caution is necessary, especially here?
It is already evident just in these comments alone how many people have them in their crosshairs.
This posture toward their brand of journalism extends all the way to the very top.
Attempts to discredit them for good must be an ordinary thing.
The reasons the power structure has for wanting that are obvious to everyone, much less to their colleagues here!
In other words, there may be other procedures that would have led them to Ms Winner and that although they relied on information from the document, they could have easily done so using an alternate method.
They would have had to sort through all of the individuals, throughout the interconnected networks, in different locations, who had ever accessed the document — almost certainly hundreds, conceivably thousands, or more.
Or does it even matter?
Also, if the pool had been greater than 6 persons, again this would indicate that they could have found her without the sharing of the document and that the sharing aspect only hastened her arrest and not necessarily the reason for the arrest.
Yes, the Intercept has a great deal to account for.
They burned a source, meaning few will go to them.
This story was not especially important, and certainly not so important as to imperil the alleged source, Reality Winner.
If it could not be published without nearly certain safety for the source, the risk was not remotely worth the story.
Bruce Schneier — an expert whom Glenn consulted in publishing some of the Snowden material — said as much yesterday on Democracy Now!
This individual is not denying the basic facts.
It is likely there will be further statement in due course, possibly today.
Being an attorney allows me to know that your absurd assessment of the FBI affidavit is, well, absurd.
The FBI almost never stacks an affidavit with false material facts.
For reasons already explained.
Responding to your points.
Their silence or non-denial is not acceptance, nor should anyone assume so.
But they are just that, opinions based on what is currently known.
New facts bring new opinions.
Agree with your statement here.
Which is why I stated previously that if these things are true and admitted to by The Intercept, they need to review their internal controls on data admission, handling and outside contact communications procedures.
I have admitted you are in a better position than most due to your relationship with Greenwald.
But, I must reserve judgement as I am hearing your comments as 3rd party and not privy to statements made by Intercept staff.
I want to hear the other side of the conversation.
If other are horrified, that is their problem.
From my point of view, then, they are easily frightened.
Again, even if all this is true, IMHO it seems that Ms.
Winner would have been caught due to her carelessness.
The Intercept is due criticism at best and Ms Winner is mostly to blame for her own predicament.
This story is barely 72 hours old and people are demanding heads to roll.
Just consider it, please.
I am not in the position of only hearing the prosecution.
I am a juror who has read myriad expert tech writers, whistleblowers, and their attorneys, stating this was a massive fuck-up of a burn for a story that has little merit.
I am a juror who knows that the lead reporter has burned at least one noble whistleblower before, and have read it is actually more than one other.
That begs for an explanation and a discontinuation.
I do not think that this reality is wholly unrelated to the current debacle, but am not right now focusing on this point.
Or are unwilling to answer it.
My point is that I am not you.
You may very well have concluded your opinion on what little information exists today.
FYI, if your experts that you rely on are Julian Assange or John Kiriakou, you might do well to remember that both of them have bones to pick with Cole and Biddle.
You should discount some of what they say.
I think fucking not.
WTF is the matter with you?
If anything, that gives John great moral and practical authority to hold forth on this matter.
As does the excellent activist and attorney who represents many whistleboweres including JohnJessalynn Raddack.
He has a personal axe to grind against Cole, which means he may not be objective, but rather opportunistic.
You make intelligent points.
No one can come to any conclusion about this matter until they have heard multiple points of view.
Evidentiary thinking requires a fair hearing of all points of view before judgment is met.
It is a mistake to substitute opinion or belief, for judgment.
Whether you support the Intercept or not, your job as judge and jury of current events require that you enter the point of view you do not agree with, reason from its premises to its conclusions and then ask yourself what you believe in light of what others believe.
This process is formidable but necessary and requires that one educate their mind to understand the difference between assumptions and facts.
The need for evidence to support claims, the claims made by those making them have the burden of proof.
This is often not understood but the fact remains it is true.
The prosecution has the burden of proof in court, the defense does not.
Critical thinking requires not just the cognitive ability to understand points of view, Socratically question, challenge necessary illusions and elicit reasoning from others.
It also requires values of thinking, such as humility, courage, and intellectual civility, an investigative orientation, empathy, and perseverance to name a few.
We are entering into the Age of Irrationality now.
Confusion is the epitaph of those not willing to think critically.
I hope you more will too.
I would urge people to refrain from making summary judgements on so little evidence and to understand or consider other mitigating facts, IMHO.
Those being the following: 1.
The internal investigation of Ms Winner from Pluribus most likey would have resulted in her apprehension without the Augusta, GA fact.
The FBI affadivit noted disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected she had email contact with The Intercept and was one of only 6 persons who accessed the file.
Until we do, we are only seeing one side of the story.
Basic fairness demands that we hear what they have to say regarding these events.
After all, they may produce some facts that contradict some portions of events or clarify other portions of events that may lead to a different conclusion.
There are potential alternate theories and explanations surrounding these events.
There is document known history of the Government wanting to engage in smear campaigns against Glenn Greenwald, WikiLeaks and other news outlets.
Greenwald wrote such a story in 2011 for Salon.
That story can be found here 4.
This is a serious open question regarding the authenticity of the document that is the central focus of Ms.
Winner but it would be confirmation that this was actually a government sting and smear campaign.
Perhaps The Intercept would still be culpable of not safeguarding information related to a source as it appears to be.
But this may also be a mitigating factor in our judgements requiring criticism instead of outright condemnation and asking for heads to be rolled.
The FBI is not accusing TI of anything.
Nobody pressured TI to publish anything.
That was their choice 4 Are we reading the same affidavit?
And what are you talking about you?
This is what the affidavit says about the publishing document page 4-5.
Government Agency has since confirmed that the reporting contains information that was classified at that level at the time that the reporting was published on or about May 5, 2017, and that such information currently remains classified at that level.
The affidavit does not mention The Intercept.
And what are you talking about you?
In response to your comment: The Reporter asked the Contractor to determine the veracity of the documents.
The Contractor informed the Reporter that he thought that the documents were fake.
Feel free to not respond to any of my posts, you twit.
Especially on a serious topic such as this, I strongly encourage one and all to ignore this particular twit you identify.
He cannot, and would not at all, contribute to productive discussion.
Is that why TI has deleted your comments?
Why is it so hard for you to ignore commenters who ask you to ignore them and whom you recommend others to ignore?
Calling names do not improve your position.
It just makes Mona happy.
Ironically she free multiplayer roulette online laughing at your understanding of basic legal procedures.
Maybe you should ask your pal Mona.
As Mona recommended you, I also suggested that you ignore my comments.
Let the name calling begin!
I was unable to chip in via Courage Foundation for the Winner cause, but I found this: apparently endorsed by her family.
Yes, but please be aware that the gofundme campaign is to raise money for family expenses.
Although that may be a very worthy cause, it is not a legal defense funds.
LDFs need to be set up and managed in very specific fashion, managed by a formal trust with a board of trustees, funds held in a trust bullseye roulette strategy and dispersed only for particular purposes, etc.
We should be hoping that an LDF is promptly established for Ms.
Winner and that it is very well funded.
Thanks for this information!
I look forward to chip in to a legal defence fund, perhaps via Courage Foundation and I now understand why the delay.
You helped break it you your people roulette app cam apologise it.
Yes she screwed up but trusting IT should not be on her screw-up list.
Fix your own fuck-up please.
It is the least you can do.
TI solicits for white-blowers not just smart whistle-blowers.
Not my cup of tea but back your own core business.
Sorry I and spellchecker made a mess of the script but the message holds.
Note no posting before finishing coffee, forward this to President Trump.
You owe both Reality and your readers an investigation and explanation.
Miss Winner will do prison time because you incompetent assholes threw her under the bus.
Disgusting what you have done.
She trusted you and you betrayed that trust.
I hope when the dust settles, those running this site and backing it financially will catch more blame than Glenn Greenwald.
I would expect he has a contract with, whatever this media corporation is named, that might prevent him for an agreed length of time, from moving on to write elsewhere.
I could never prove this, but I strongly suspect this is a big get with Glenn for the Snowden leaks and later the book and film.
I doubt he has had that much say in who gets hired or fired.
Too much is getting laid at his door, in my most humble opinion.
I still believe and respect GG, have followed him online everywhere, but if he remains silent still, now, at this utter bullshit even from his own launched site, I might start believing in conspiracy theories about him.
And I remain objective enough to have no idol.
Or at least, enough to be able to tell when one has failed, then move on and then reflect.
Glenn Greenwald, is this the moment?
The choice of utter denunciation vs.
Speak up now or never.
We are former law partners and friends.
He and and I have had some exchanges on this fiasco.
He certainly was not promoting it.
When you write: The choice of utter denunciation vs.
Speak up now or never.
You can assume — and my comments throughout this thread show it — that I hold a similar position.
You may also assume that my similar position has been communicated.
At this point, I have reason to believe he sees and understands the gravityfor all of: Reality Winner, this site, and his own reputation.
I expect some comment in relatively short order.
I further understand, however, that he and other TI principals, including Jeremy Scahill, have had to have a reasonable amount of time to assess, consult and determine the course of action moving forward.
Why in the fuck should I read this site anymore?
My last bastion of hope after that moron partisan Mackey, and that that ignorant White Hats Promotor whose name I forget, was already on limited legs.
And are still hired or paid or whatever it is that The Intercept gives to a useless person such as Mackey.
Final point: This site should not be something that gets 1700 comments on how it posts Bullshit, nor one that keeps a piece of shit like Mackey on retainer.
Glenn Greenwald, is this the moment?
The choice of utter denunciation vs.
Speak up now or never.
There were other ways to confirm the story rather than sending the copies to the actual agency who identified and arrested your source.
Let that be a lesson to other whistle blowers.
Mona quotes Galactus-36215: All this hype is basically on an unsupported affidavit from the FBI arresting agent.
Unfortunately, the affidavit it question thanks in large measure to the stunning incompetence of The Intercept team working the story is actually meticulously supported.
On June 3, 2017, your affiant spoke to WINNER at her home in Augusta, Georgia.
WINNER further admitted removing the classified intelligence reporting from her office space, retaining it, and mailing it from Augusta, Georgia, to the News Outlet, which she knew was not authorized to receive or possess the documents.
WINNER further acknowledged that she was aware of the contents of the intelligence reporting and that she knew the contents of the reporting could be used to the injury of the United States and to the advantage of a foreign nation.
A confession, no doubt recorded, or at least printed and signed, is pretty good support for an affidavit, dontcha think, Galactus?
This young woman, by all accounts driven by confused idealism and almost certainly exposed by The Intercept, is facing ten years in federal prison.
I was thinking of items like accusation of the FBI agent saying the Contractor told the Reporter that the document was Fake, etc.
I would like to hear from TI regarding items related to TI.
And the hype I speak of is all the calls for condemnation on so few facts only 72 hours after this story broke.
I just believe people should be more responsible and level-headed as this is such a serious situation.
I pinpointed your poor analysis of the affidavit and your poor choice of words, but you preferred name callings.
He did not do anything wrong or illegal.
The FBI is not accusing him of anything.
They are just reporting his statements.
You, personally can believe that is enough to confirm a government conspiracy, but realistically only a kangaroo court in North Korea would come to that conclusion based simply on that.
I told you those commenters were laughing at your poor understanding of basic legal procedures, but you were too busy calling me names.
Now, they are telling you the same thing I told you, but in an unprofessional and even demeaning language.
They are factually correct, so take it like a man!
Galactus-36215 All this hype is basically on an unsupported affidavit from the FBI arresting agent.
Reality Winner, a human being, is under arrest and facing years in a federal prison.
The affidavit is self-supporting.
This is widely reported, and not denied by any Intercept staff or agent.
Good and reasonable people on the right side of whistleblowing issues are outraged at what has happened here.
It is well, well past time for refusal to face facts to cease.
It is time for this site to undertake a radical overhaul, and for attention be given to the plight of one Reality Winner.
Doug posted a worthwhile reply to this.
I would add, because this is now a legal matter, this does not limit or preclude The Intercept from sanctioning those employees who were responsible for operation security pertaining to the document, and their ignorance of these matters has cost a young woman, Reality Winner serious harm.
The rush to publish disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected speculative government noise and article without proper consideration for all aspects of security has permanently stained the reputation of the Intercept.
People are way too vindictive.
And until we hear The Intercepts view of these events, I consider all the condemnation going on as hype.
You and others might want to only hear one side of the story prosecutorsbut I prefer to hear the other sides defendants case before deciding.
But I suspect those who rush to judgement and throw theirs friends work under the bus at the first sign of trouble should reflect on why they are so quick to rush to judgement.
What makes this story different from the usual stories that regularly accumulate a couple of hundred comments at the most?
Websites like this should publish their metadata.
The NSA has it, google has it, research firms have it, so why not give it to the public?
You assume they congregate for a meal.
I suppose there are more prosaic explanations.
Maybe russian roulette law national press coverage is like ringing the dinner gong and the vultures are just gathering to see what the noise is about.
I thought trolls came from Norway?
Has Putin annexed Scandinavia overnight?
Milton, we need your help over here in Europe…the trolls are coming.
So let me get this straight: The Russians hacked our election to help Trump win.
They did this by giving Hillary the popular majority and a 3mil vote lead.
This is a whole lotta nothing.
Are you unaware of all the reports of gerrymandering, and voter suppression tactics etc.
Is all that BS just fine with you as long as your side wins?
Are you blind to the obvious corruption of bought and paid for politicians?
Neither candidate was the right choice, and neither party is operating in the best interests of the American people.
New parties are desperately needed to ensure that power is no longer abused by corrupted candidates from the established parties.
Democracy should not be owned by any political parties, it belongs to the citizens.
You may have already seen the following on The Intercept at the link provided, which was posted yesterday on The Intercept, but I think the entirety of it is worth posting here.
Shortly after the article was posted, the Justice Department announced the arrest of Reality Leigh Winner, a 25-year-old government contractor in Augusta, Georgia, for transmitting defense information under the Espionage Act.
Although we have no knowledge of the identity of the person who provided us with the document, the U.
Winner faces allegations that have source been proven.
However, because of the continued investigation, we will make no further comment on it at this time.
Where were the editors?
Where was common sense?
This woman is going to go to jail for decades for your failure.
UNSUCCESSFULLY ATTEMPTING TO BREAK THROUGH INTERCEPTS DEEP STATE BLOWJOB SETTING.
I did my best to wade through this boring b.
Gave up about two-thirds of way through.
What on earth has happened to The Intercept?
But there is a lot of rumor-mongering going on today.
Several commenters believe TI has inadvertently outed their source.
The Twittersphere and Internet are up in arms about it.
The accusations come from a government released warrant on the suspected leaker of the document from this article who was arrested within minutes of publication of this article.
All this hype is basically on an unsupported affidavit from the FBI arresting agent.
People are voraciously attacking the Intercept based on this affidavit and not at least hearing The Intercepts version of these events.
They are piling on after only hearing very little evidence and not allowing Intercept management to respond.
But people are vindictive.
Maybe you did not use the appropriate word or you did not read the FBI affidavit.
The affidavit has nothing to do with the Intercept.
The probable cause was based on a material evidence: 1 a document they have analyzed and 2 strong evidence that Winner printed that document 3 Winner was the only one with an email contact with the news outlet There is no hearsay here.
Some portions of its writers would more value sending a woman to jail for decades in order to print nonsense and elevate themselves, than they would be ethical people.
His articles since are mostly d pryde russian roulette />Kind of child like.
This big dumbshit bomb may make it 0 in 10.
About to take the site off my list.
Why bother reading things like this?
I rational The Intercept article now is akin to espying a four-leaf clover, or albino toad.
Except for knowing that their incompetent.
So yeah, this site is apparently now shit, with nothing and no one in its own power to call it that.
What could of been the tip of the spear for great independent investigative journalism has been blunted!
Dear Glenn Greenwald, You must improve your flint knapping, sharpen the spear, make it right and lead by example or someone else will show us the way.
Speak up and speak clearly.
Break out your yellow highlighter… Dennis Montgomerys FBI NSA CIA Project Dragnet suit against Director Comey will be heard by wait for it Judge Leon.
Judge Leon likes direct evidence.
Dennis Montgomery likes direct evidence.
Will Jim Comeys proxies McCabe and Rosenstein collude with former director Comey to lose, misplace or destroy the direct evidence.
The Deep State may have willfully helped unmask tens or hundreds of millions of innocent Americans with Mr Montgomerys help.
Perhaps Ryan Grimm could call the FBIs DC Field office and get the journalistic ball rolling.
That is once you tie Betsy Reed to a chair and lock Pierre in his safe space near Edward Snowdens Legacy Betrayed.
Montgomery alleges that more than 20 million American identities were illegally unmasked — credit reports, emails, phone conversations and Internet traffic, were some of the items the NSA and CIA collected.
He said he returned the hard drives to the FBI, a fact confirmed in government documents reviewed by Circa.
All kinds of very frightening shit going down in the Middle East now while this soap opera plays out.
Terrorist attacks in Iran, US destroys Syrian forces in Al-Tanf, apparently the Badr Brigades of Iran are in Syria now… According to RT; Pentagon reports Syrian forces were inside a.
I have a major problem with Muslims getting killed.
Again, a young disgusting russian roulette challenge redirected is in jail and might stay in jail for a long time.
But hey, everybody has her own opinion.
My point is not complicated.
Very easy to understand.
Most commenters here do not care about Muslims getting killed.
They have a problem with the US or Israel.
That explains the lack of interest in subjects regarding ISIS killing Muslims, or Taliban killing Muslims.
I was just reporting facts 2 interesting enough to get an answer from you!
Used to be a fan of the Intercept until they started burning sources and publishing this useless garbage.
Another piece of propaganda: The deliberate omission of the death-bed statement by the JAG Captain, who says he was ordered to whitewash the Liberty incident, creates the gratuitous uncertainty claimed by the author of that piece.
The dishonesty of The Intercept is staggering.
If you want to Rig US.
I keep getting more and more pissed about this as the hours pass.
Idiotically handing over the ID of the leaker to the NSA was bad enough, but especially because the info handed over amount to nothing.
There is still no evidence here.
Look at the twitter chart from the Intercept.
This entire article amounts to a very long-winded propaganda piece meant to be repeated on MSM as if it does contain evidence, and to be parroted by moronic commentators on message-boards as if this is a big deal.
All of you should be fired for this.
As well as all editors who allowed this to see print.
Maybe the whole Intercept site should be disbanded.
I could not agree more w your assessment.
This has to be the fastest nose dive from credible to clown sellouts that I can remember.
The Intercept is dead.
One more irrelevant rag tot he trash heap of shitty journalism.
Very sad to see Intercept allow this to happen.
I am disappointed after promoting them to friends and family as dependable critical thinkers.
It is verging on mass hysteria among journalists and the rest of us.
Perhaps there is another side to this story, but the way it is being portrayed in Canada, all the good work done by Glen Greenwald is going now the toilet.
Unlike US media where Comey is the flavor of the day, this story is getting a lot of play here.
At least two former whistle blowers, John Kiriakou and Melvin Goodman, have excoriated especially Matthew Cole, but also the Intercept itself, for abandoning government employees who reveal information they believe is in the public interest.
I hope we will hear more from the Intercept on this mess.
The spam email exploits are the same crap that hits my inbox every week.
Watching experts on even DN is a joke!
FAKE news, FAKE reality.
Confusionism brought to the level of every present.
If the Intercept or Greenwald or Poitras or anyone in the public eye wants validity they will all have to start being accountable for every action and explain SELLOUT.
If they cannot, they are done.
The spooks can not be allowed to define reality for the 99%.
The report does not detail Russian hacking.
That is fake news.
The report claims that Russia hacked election machines with vague evidence that could be cooked in a simple text editor, let alone the complex tools of the NSA.
It most likely details nothing but scandal, lies and false evidence like the Iraq WMD crap.
It also details the useful idiocy of the neoliberal Intercept.
Get your reporting right!
Glenn spent a full day or two clarifying Snowden understood the implications of what he was doing and what the most likely adverse outcomes might include.
Glenn clearly knew Ed grasped both the gravity of his situation and that he regretted he only ha one life to give when Ed whimsically called the bottom bunk at Gitmo.
And this was only after weeks of secure communications mostly Laura and Ed getting Glenn up to speed on journalism opsec 101 preceding meeting in Hong Kong.
This Intercepts founding reporters were all targets of the Deep State for years.
Micah, Morgan, Sam, Matt and Ryan should all know better.
Betsy should be fired.
Only Micah probably actually knows better.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1939 W.
Auden, 1907 — 1973 I sit in one of the dives On Fifty-second Street Uncertain and afraid As the clever hopes expire Of a low dishonest decade: Waves of anger and fear Circulate over the bright And darkened lands of the earth, Obsessing our private lives; The unmentionable odour of death Offends the September night.
Accurate scholarship can Unearth the whole offence From Luther until now That has driven a culture mad, Find what occurred at Linz, What huge imago made A psychopathic god: I and the public know What all schoolchildren learn, Those to whom evil is done Do evil in return.
Very Very true and potent art.
Got my day off to a thoughtful start.
Thank You We need not to just change the packaging but the present, double entendre.
This starts with each person and ends with every Nation.
We are playing a do or for many die game and the door for quick enough change is closing on the human race.
To many factions have locked horns and will not allow each other to drink, the center cannot hold totally polarized ideologies.
Extremist on both side block the way.
The Intercept has lost credibility and maybe more.
Until this rectified the Intercept is sinking.
BUT IF GG can make this an issue it would help.
And where is the criminal investigation into this?
There are two key points nearly universally agreed upon by commenters here and elsewhere: 1 There is no substance in the article or the leaked document.
Reality was egregiously and severely underprotected by The Intercept TI.
Now, here are my own comments for TI, a publication I had hoped against hope would the best news online when it was founded: 1 I suspect at least one of the authors, probably Cole, is an IC plant.
These are obvious and glaring blunders.
Admit it, apologize, and do everything you can to avoid another episode like this in the future.
Did you provide the document, with folds and printing codes, to the IC?
Do you know what people think when you ignore these questions?
Much that you write I concur with.
And there are compelling legal and prudential reasons for not discussing, well, a great many things, including for reasons pertaining to not worsening things for Ms.
Neither Greenwald nor Scahill evinced support for the barely worthwhile story, and their hands are not involved as far as anyone knows.
They are no doubt pretty occupied dealing with this entire mess.
And yes, I agree with your other points regarding the wisdom of the statements made and not made, but of course I am a curious reader, not an involved party.
I know Greenwald will deal with it honestly and will publish explanations.
He has never given me a reason to doubt his integrity.
His first duty was to his source, not to the poor souls in Gitmo.
Eventually, of course, the government learned this and it was part of what John served time for.
TI should fire those 4 clowns 4 dudes to craft a CNN-like article, with evidence incriminating their source in the published images!!
The reporters and editors responsible for this amateurish disaster definitely need to be terminated, as quickly and as openly as possible.
However, there is much that TI cannot now do or say without even further endangering yea, condemning the alleged source.
As Macroman noted, there is and has been, in my view a leadership vacuum here at TI.
That has to stop.
I expect he now realizes this.
Hell, I only read TI anymore for the occasionally enlightened viewpoints expressed by commenters — on the whole, still far more concentrated here than other sites and forums.
There are vanishingly few articles worth reading lately.
It works on my dog sometimes.
All the available evidence suggests that the alleged leaker did not contact TI about the here via email.
As far as can be determined at this point, her only email communications with this publication were on March 30, when she requested a copy of a podcast, and on March 31, when she confirmed a subscription request.
Both of those transactions seem to have used her work computer but her personal email address.
As far as can be determined at this point, her only email communications with this publication were on March 30, when she requested a copy of a podcast, and on March 31, when she confirmed a subscription request.
In any case, the email contacts were just icing.
The only information the government needed to track the alleged leaker was 1 the microdot code, which TI handed them in living color; and 2 the log for that printer.
At most, the prior, innocent communications simplified the interview process.
The theory was advanced Click the following article Progressive The whole pattern is looking more like a dan rather sting op i think maybe if we listen carefully, we can hear the ic boys laughing at their favorite lunch counter.
Thanks for the link.
I like Sane Progressive and her youtube blogs.
Poor Glenn Greenwald being put on the defensive over this fiasco.
Three of the four authors of this piece of journalistic drivel have worked for the mainstream print and television media for most of their careers.
What brought them to The Intercept?
No story That is the scenario which would conform to your preexisting world view.
Therefore it must be the correct one.
You guys really need to just click for source with the apparent fact that you were so incompetent that article source managed to out and thereby totally screw you source here.
You pathetic statement at this point is sad and pathetic.
At this point click time no one should trust you about anything.
Is The Intercept in lockdown mode?
Why would a linguist specializing in Pashto, Farsi, and Dari need to access a report on Russian hacking?
This whole story smells fishy from the get go.
How does a 25 year continue reading with a highly political Facebook page, very critical of the president, get a top secret clearance within a month of being hired by the NSA contracted Pluribus company?
How convenient is it that the 5 pages she leaked to the Intercept are basically a smoking gun implicating the Russians in election hacking, exactly the kind of information that those who have been trying to prove the Trump-Russia-Hacking narrative have been praying for?
And how could a supposedly bright person who worked in intelligence with the Air Force as a translator, be so ham handed and obvious in covering her tracks?
Could it be that those in the intelligence services — part of a deep state hellbent on taking down this administration — would resort to false flag Psy Ops as part of an ongoing coup?
In a single article the NSA and agents of the Hegemon managed to discredit The Intercept and ramp up the pressure for a war with Russia.
So, an indepedent news source gets smeared, the Hegemon destroys their patsy to make an example to everyone what happens to snitches or anyone they suspect may talktherefore ratcheting up the fear at home, and they stoke fear of foreigners abroad by blaming the Russians for all this drama.
All of this was achieved with just a few pieces of paper.
This was expertly executed misinformation, and the players acted exactly as expected.
The system works … just not for you.
The only thing missing in that scheme is that the girl should be innocent!
The culture of cyber circus is here.
Children of the computer age.
What does this all mean?
Its espionage, spying, betrayal, double agents for the uber generation.
Everyone knows the truthand everyone knows the lies.
Meanwhile, at home, on the ground.
But all the brilliant computer geeks and disciples fight over this computer soap opera.
Unreal distraction, with no resolve.
Seriously, this place is morphing into Infowars or something!
Speaking of a Circus, go check out the Senate Intelligence Hearings if you want a good laugh.
This has been portrayed as an interview containing valuable insights.
It is not, and it is almost inconceivable that anyone could think it is.
First, it is RT.
Interesting viewpoints sometimes, but nothing it does is believable without 100% independent collaboration.
Second, the interview is with an ex CIA officer.
He might sound like your favorite uncle when your were five, but again, you need 100% independent collaboration before believing anything he says.
Third is the stupid interviewer.
Seriously, raise the question that maybe this leak makes the NSA look good?
This incident is yet another indictment of the independent contractor system, where people without real vetting get access to information that you would expect the NSA to be much more careful with.
There really is not much more to this story.
That a reporter might have screwed up big time is really of no importance in the long run next to the disgraceful performance of the NSA.
Fourth, there is actually nothing in this interview that you did not think of yourself a few minutes after hearing it.
Ignore the above post, gentlemen and ladies.
Mike Sulzer is deeply ignorant on the subjects he addresses therein.
If you want to try to convince me that RT is anything other than Russian propaganda if sometimes very carefully down for propagandaI am willing to listen.
But expecting me to believe that an ex CIA officer is a good guy just based on your say so is absurd.
If you want to try to convince me that RT is anything other than Russian propaganda if sometimes very carefully down for propagandaI am willing to listen.
But expecting me to believe that an ex CIA officer is a good guy just based on your say so is absurd.
But expecting me to believe that an ex CIA officer is a good guy just based on your say so is absurd.
Now, go do your homework.
And not what you did in recommending what PG said in the RT interview based on his reputation.
And you have to learn when you can make such an evaluation.
Usually it requires many facts supported by good logic and references than can be checked.
An RT interview does not provide any of that.
When you and Harrell point out to me that all media have their restrictions and biases as a response to my criticism of RT, you are engaging in one of those rhetorical no-nos, never mind which one, you can figure it out.
If you were to spend time actually watching rt.
No news outlet on the planet is pristine, much less free from some propaganda.
RT can be a heck of lot more insightful than 99% of what is on American media.
That statement works for watching RT.
As always, judgement is called for when watching or listening.
Oh, and while I am harassing you, there is also your comment on the FBI affidavit, which it appears that you took at face value.
What they write down and what actually happened need not be the same thing.
For example, it seems that these fake cell phone base stations, stingrays, and related devices, are often used, but also often left out when it comes to constructing the story of how the bad guy got caught.
That is, keep the questionable actions out of later legal proceedings.
This is even more likely to be a priority when the NSA asks the FBI to investigate and provides its help, especially when a news organization such as the Intercept, perceived as subversive by many, is involved.
Mike… Give me a break.
If Putin had incriminating evidence against Trump, Bond roulette strategy wiki and Hillary would drop on their knees if he asked them to.
If they really wanted to damage Hillary, they would have disclosed all the details of the Uranium One deal.
Care to comment on that?
The Russians do care however to divide America, which is exactly what happened.
A basket-case on the right, and McCarthy on the left.
If Putin had incriminating evidence against Trump, Maxine and Hillary would drop on their knees if he asked them to.
So the Intercept has gone over to the dark side.
Quoting the NSA as if they were authoritative, when in fact they are liars determined to get the US into a war with Russia.
His name is rarely mentioned without bringing up Snowden and or The Intercept.
This is great for the organization.
I hope this expands the good work you guys are doing Small request with larger implications: Would everyone please stop calling Ms.
Edward for good or ill as you will, acted live online roulette fixed a pro and man on a mission.
Winners was definitely amateur hour school girl.
If Ed had pulled the same stunt he would have earned the B word, boy with a small b at that.
Thanks to sour-mash on the guardian giving info on DRE voting without a paper trail it explains why NSA does not know if the hack was successful in changing votes.
Since VR system was connected to the voting system.
That is the story here, they cannot check votes.
The VR system serviced 3 states with DRE voting and no paper trail.
So none of our security depts can tell if votes were messed with.
So they make statements like this that make them look stupid, while not telling us they cannot safe guard the integrity of people votes.
The NSA, however, is uncertain about the results of the attack, according to the report.
We need a paper trail with all votes.
So hand recounts can be done.
Carry on with your conspiracy theories when reality shows our ass is exposed because of DRE voting with no paper casino roulette />Intercept do a story on this.
We know who favors this bs voting system.
But then given the sold out candidates we always have shoved down our throats does it matter.
The fix is in since long ago.
It seems very counter-productive for an intelligence agency to map out exactly how they honed in on Reality Winner.
As for printer identification that is decades old technology.
It all sounds a bit fishy!
I think they knew that.
We will probably never know the extent to which the Intercept was a deliberate participant in this corruption, but the fact remains that this site is now clearly playing for one of the corrupt corporate owned teams in the Versailles on the Potomac.
TI was one of the few news outlets I trusted, no longer.
This is just very sad on so many levels.
How did this happen TI?
I suggest that as you have repeatedly called for the DNC to look deep at its failings, TI should do the same.
Top DHS official announces retirement amid IG investigation POSTED 9:24 PM, MAY 1, 2017, BY CNN WIRE In early April, the chairs of the Senate Homeland Security Committee and the House Oversight Committee sent the inspector general a letter requesting more information about the probe.
In the letter, the chairs — Utah Rep.
Jason Chaffetz and Wisconsin Sen.
Department of Homeland Security addresses.
He says they all traced back to DHS internet provider addresses.
The next one took place just days before the SEC primary.
Another occurred in May, the day before the general primary, and then two more took place in November, the day before and the day of the presidential election.
Kemp has now written a letter to the Trump administration asking for a formal review after his inauguration next month.
Last week, the DHS confirmed the large Nov.
Customs and Border Protection internet gateway.
Unsatisfied with the response he got from DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson this week, Kemp fired off a letter Wednesday to loop in President-elect Donald Trump.
Even though DHS offered cyber security help to states prior to the election, the Wall Street Journal notes that Georgia was one of the states that specifically denied assistance.
That attempt was linked to an IP address associated with DHS, he said.
The attempt was unsuccessful, according to the state.
The computers also house information about company incorporations.
According to a letter written by Kemp to DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson, the attempted intrusion occurred 1 week after the election on November 15, 2016 at 8:43AM and came from an IP address associated with DHS 216.
As a result of some of the concerns, the department clarified that assistance on election-related security matters was voluntary and encouraged states to take advantage of DHS resources and expertise to help secure state election systems.
Johnson, the DHS chief, said in September.
Why are you guys not owning up to your reckless and careless endangerment of the leaker.
The rush do do instructions roulette game has blinded you to your first responsibility — do no harm.
Feeblemind be caught next by NSA?
Galactus-36215 It is possible that this latest story is a hoax to discredit publishers like Greenwald and The Intercept.
Further, my private discussions with staff do not remotely suggest any such beliefs on the part of TI.
Right now, the critical issue is supporting a naive, idealistic young woman named Reality Winner.
All evidence strongly suggests that this site committed an outrageous series of errors that lead to revealing her identity, quite regardless of whether she herself did not follow reasonable operational security.
Sounds like a set-up to me.
As the FBI was being called in, NSA officials also heard from an employee of Pluribus International, the private intelligence firm that was contracting Winner to the agency.
The employee said he or she had also been contacted about the leak by an Intercept journalist.
Bah, they revealed to the contractor what led them there: The second is that on May 24, a reporter from the Intercept reached out to an unnamed government contractor, trying to determine the validity of the leak.
During the exchange, the Intercept revealed that the leak had been mailed with a postmark of Augusta, Georgia, where Winner lives.
What can one say to that?
The TI journo appears to have contacted some contractor with whom he had some previous communication and was told, initially, that the document appeared fake.
It was at this time that the Augusta postmark was shared.
Later, TI re-contacted this contractor to say that it had determined that the document was authentic.
BTW, bah, thanks for the.
Please reread that section, Doug.
This means it was not independent.
Here is what the warrant states clearly.
Also on June I, 2017, the Reporter texted the Contractor and said that a U.
S Government Agency official had verified that the document was real.
It does not refer to Pluribus.
S Government Agency official had verified that the document was real.
It is not a private entity contracted to such an agency.
Yes, national security reporters know where various defense contractors are, who the players are etc.
The reporters here also knew the postmark on the hard document sent to them.
And they shared that with a defense contractor.
Who no doubt passed it right along to the government of the United States.
Secondly, she has said abhorrent thing about President Trump in her social media accounts.
She must at least respect the democratic process that has made President Trump the Commander-in-Chief to whom she reported till yesterday.
This is quite inexcusable.
She must now accept her punishment as the former MSNBC hack Krystal Ball admitted in the Tucker Carlson show last night.
When I re read the Guardian piece on Ms.
Winner, I became very skeptical of the entire story.
It seemed to paint her in sweetness and light, as she cared so deeply about rescuing animals, her devotion to yoga, ad nauseum.
More suspect is the Mark Warner follow up piece.
This is too pessimistic.
Everybody may be on the same side here.
Winner may have cut a prior deal where the intelligence released will be judged to flatter the NSA, in which case she would only receive a suspended sentence.
The Intercept may be formally welcomed into TheResistance.
The NSA will receive credit for foiling some sort of undefined Russian hacking roulette occasion casino de table />Of course, maybe Ms.
Winner was a patsy and maybe The Intercept was the target of this operation.
But in my experience, the world is a less sinister place than many people suppose.
Everybody may be on the same side here.
The NSA are the people who prepare very poor quality Powerpoint slides.
But the best thing that should be done is for The Intercept to state how the document was independently verified as authentic.
Also, Greenwald and Wikileaks were the targets of HB Gary, the DOD and Booz Allen in previously published Salon.
The outcome of which would serve government purposes as follows 1.
It destroy credibility of news outlets reporting classified material.
It deters would-be leakers 3.
It furthers the Russia narrative Right now, the Intercept should release to the best of its ability the methods used to authenticate the document that is outlined in this article.
But the best thing that should be done is for The Intercept to state The Intercept has many things it had better state.
Many matters, of course, they cannot and ought not discuss.
Not everyone is as mature and sophisticated as so many of us who participate here.
Myself, I find it entirely plausible that someone of her profile exists and would do what she did, for all the reasons described.
John has both the moral and practical authority to be as outraged as he is.
It touches on just about every thing about this case that seems fishy to me.
I do, however, prefer linking to the story at its original source since it provides a more revealing picture of Reality Winner not her biography, just her :.
As in: in reality the winner is Hillary?
And to this day, months later, that very same corrupt media apparatus has YET to mention the contents of those emails.
The Russia Boogeyman thing is hilarious.
What is a shame here is the handling of the source.
You all have had plenty of opportunity to learn how to handle this sort of leak, but you burn your leak on this one — why?
How could you do that to someone trying to help.
I am a big supporter of your news, but this is pretty bad and something that probably will keep people from coming to you in the future.
The culture of cyber circus is here.
Children of the computer age.
What does this all mean?
Its espionage, spying, betrayal, double agents for the uber generation.
Everyone knows the truthand everyone knows the lies.
Meanwhile, at home, on the ground.
But all the brilliant computer geeks and disciples fight over this computer soap opera.
Unreal distraction, with no resolve.
The movement or person that can inspire real positive change and replace the false hope of the Hillarys, Trumps, Bushes, Obamas, and Yes even the Burnies and so on can reshape the future to better serve the Nation and the World.
Will a modern version of a Lincoln or Washington suited to the times please STANDUP and restore the Republic and provide for basic human needs.
Yes, for sure opinions vary on past presidents.
I am in the we need something different and BETTER boat.
The ones we have tried recently are taking on water and listing badly.
If Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi showed up to inspire the Middle East he would probable get very purposely thrown off a roof or targeted by a Hellfire missile.
In the past humanity has murder many great leader, God bless Them and rest Them, for living with and achieving a greater purpose.
Still my hope is Someone s will step-up and succeed.
Also, what moral high ground does the United States have when they have meddled in election after election, year after year, hacking other nations in the process?
There is a room full of people farting.
They INSIST that the smell in the room is the work of dangerous outside forces and the consumption of private corporate beans is not mentioned.
The truth is that the farts have more substance than what the people in the room claim is the source of the ever growing smell.
Instead, they demand that more insulation is needed and the stifling heat is proof that they are saints.
Crude but well said.
I like the smell of septic in the morning it smells like victory.
Not really but the foul stench can show where the bodies are buried.
This has been portrayed as an interview containing valuable insights.
It is not, and it is almost inconceivable that anyone could think it russian roulette revolver app />First, it is RT.
Interesting viewpoints sometimes, but nothing it does is believable without 100% independent collaboration.
Second, the interview is with an ex CIA officer.
He might sound like your favorite uncle when your were five, but again, you need 100% independent collaboration before believing anything he says.
Third is the stupid interviewer.
Seriously, raise the question that maybe this leak makes the NSA look good?
This incident is yet another indictment of the independent contractor system, where people without real vetting get access to information that you would expect the NSA to be much more careful with.
There really is not much more to this story.
That a reporter might have screwed up big time is really of no importance in the long run next to the disgraceful performance of the NSA.
Fourth, there is actually nothing in this interview that you did not think of yourself a few minutes after hearing it.
I would like to remind people that contractors like Ms.
And that the surrounding MSM storyline is exactly an example of what was discovered by Greenwald some years ago in this story at Salon.
The critics of the Intercept related to this article would best be advised to READ THIS!
It is possible that this latest story is a hoax to discredit publishers like Greenwald and The Intercept.
This EXACT thing was discovered years ago surrounding the DOD and Booz Allen.
Glenn is the Intercept.
This article is him: same wracklesness and ambulance chasing with very little substance.
But troubles began earlier than this article.
So, TI operatives have simply discarded all pretences of objectivity and care for sources and started chasing their tales.
The Intercept is over.
Or is one of The Intercept reporters on the CIA payroll and undermining the reputation of The Intercept was the primary purpose of this operation?
Either way, I think Ms Winner was just a patsy who took the bait.
But perhaps Ms Winner is doing her part for King and Country.
And I do mean King.
How did the Intercept journalist know who employed Ms Winner?
The government saying the document is authentic or inauthentic is meaningless, since it is not their job to validate documents for The Intercept.
There is sometimes a trade-off between protecting the source and establishing the validity of the documents.
Does anyone know her real name and whether she is trustworthy?
Remember how Dan Rather got punked with an apparently planted fake document detailing how G.
Bush went AWOL from his National Guard duties during the Vietnam War.
Yes, they did, those sneaky Bushes.
But I shed no tears for Rather, a Deep State tool from at least as far back as the days he knowingly helped cover up JFK and shill for the Warren report.
Yes — those sneaky Bushes.
But I shed no tears for Rather, a Deep State tool from at least as far back as the days he knowingly helped cover up JFK and shill for the Warren report.
All leaks are not equal.
The girl and TI look like dumb and dumber leaking trivia, silly crime that can result in serious time.
This leaking thing is serious and dangerous bussiness, if you must hang for a sheep not a lamb.
I hope that some of US are involved in the investigation of several issues, organizations and many people who have committed sedition at the least.
Again thank you Donald for upsetting the rotten apple cart, even if you are one of the apples?
How Intercept reporters turned a would be whistleblower in Wikileaks searches for the reporter giving evidence to find Reality Winner, but search no longer: it is here, just in front of your eyes.
And the reporters who published this evidence have signed it, Matthew Cole, Richard Esposito, Sam Biddle and Ryan Grim.
Zoom in, Strg-+ or Strg + mouse wheel will do.
Look at the seemingly white background — can you spot the yellow points seemingly aligned in a square grid?
Not hard to find.
Those are the hidden ID marks of the printer that printed this document.
Find a position where you can spot the pattern clearly.
Next look up the pattern, e.
They just got to look up the printer with serial number 29535218, look up the print job on May 9 06:20, see who ordered it, and send a squad team.
Still wondering why it took just an hour after the publication to track her down?
This is a complete lie created by the left media.
This is not even a real Top Secret document.
There is no factual truth or science or engineering in it.
Unbelievable that people believe this.
A lot of people are claiming that TI burned their source.
Maybe the NSA identified her from the copy of the document that TI showed them, but the source took so few precautions that it was inevitable.
They then found out that only six employees had printed the document which narrowed it down.
Next, they found an e-mail to The Intercept on her computer.
This leaker might as well have signed her name to it.
All hacking, manipulation and rigging were done by organizations related to Robert Mercer, the reclusive Long Island hedge-fund manager billionaire.
The Russia hacking psyop is everywhere, and the Russians should know both Hillary and Trump are establishment con artists.
Intercept should be embarrassed for spreading such lies.
WHAT A COLLASOL FARCE.
Barabus — This media-privately owned weaponized media may have destroyed the greatest country on earth.
Our grandparents had character and saved freedom many times just since the turn of the century.
The job of this media now is to report irresponsibly, lie, care nothing about credibility and will not rest until a fairly elected president is fully destroyed.
And this media has been given the ok to be as dishonest as needed, collectively, to achieve this goal.
The end justifies the means.
They have used a very ignorant-low information-dumbed down segment of our society to do this.
When the CIA could not actually take his life, the media stepped in and took his legitimacy.
This is the same media who would lay in front of a speeding bus for the former president.
Will the alt media be able to overcome the dishonest networks?
I used to think so.
Idk…we did our part-we voted.
We put him in office…a fact that does not matter to the ruling class who would take our choice away.
Well, 8 did not see any hard evidence.
Anyways, looks like the CIA has been out staged by another country by successfully throwing a boondoggle in our elections.
My views on it are here: Journalism requires that document be published and reported.
His situation must be very close to untenable.
The reputation of this outlet is to some extent based on his discernment of the spin and hidden agendas of the msm.
Glenn Greenwald might as well be Don Lemon.
Useful idiots for the anti-American globalists.
Looks like you guys got set up — BIG TIME!
Set up the Intercept.
Intelligence was caught planting Russian fingerprints.
We dont want to fight Russia.
Why would anyone pick Russia over NK or Islam right now?
Go after Russia for helping NK not this garbage.
This smells of false flag.
This leaker is also a psy op ploy.
We must realize that between China, Russia, Europe, Banking, NWO, Globalists, Leakers Snowden, Assange, Kim Dotcom, Manning there are many players involved.
The stolen election narrative is far fetched.
The leaker is likely being forced to act or was burnt by force.
The real leak is who is forcing or orchestrating this burn.
Or that we were at war with them.
All 1 billion of them.
Also, the only reason this Russia Ate My Homework!
The SECOND Hillary got asked that question she pointed towards Russia.
And of course the colluding media ran with it.
Notice that the media never did mention the contents of those leaked emails?
Only that Russia had something to do with it?
Okay, fine, but what about the contents of those leaked emails?
One can hope the lawsuit against the DNC results in some form of change or enforced coverage.
It should be noted that one of the things from the emails Clinton using state parties to funnel their money to her was reported prior to the emails- and media reporters dismissed the lady that broke the story, because she simply played a journalist on film.
You got scooped by a lady known for playing a journalist for a great metropolitan newspaper!
The Intercept is no longer a place for whistle blowers.
This tactic would not work for hacking into voting machines.
Think: If Russia had somehow hacked voting machines to ensure that Trump would win, how is it that Clinton won the most votes?
The opposite would have been true.
Both candidates were opposed by much of their own voting bases.
As a result, roughly half the country voted third party or withheld their votes.
In the end, Clinton won the most votes, Trump won the Electoral College vote, and Russia had nothing to do with any of it.
But what was the result in Durham?
If the Russians did do anything, they did a terrible job.
Especially just after how they published the TigerSwan documents.
This is a stunning revelation.
Indeed the Russians have been hacking into our elections since the Clinton era.
Below, Uncle Bob links to an RT interview with former CIA agent, very smart and generally reliable paleocon good guy yes, really and co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.
This comment is an opinion only.
Do not take while on other medications.
Didja watch and listen?
I find the whole thing very suspicious, obviously.
If this is manipulation, as you think it is, it is an exemplar of evil genius.
Why is this so hard to believe?
Booz Allen and Bank of America were concocting plans like this to delegitimize Greenwald.
Is it really that unbelievable that the intelligence community might lay an egg to hatch to discredit publishers?
I recently read an interesting comment on this which asserted that the Intel Comm is not above dishing out disinformation within their own ranks, in order to provoke the sort of response shown by RWinner.
In fairness though, TI did go the distance in terms of providing advice to guard as best as possible source anonymity, by listing various seven stud online tools, how to create small degrees of separation between the source and TI, etc; apparently RWinner did not RTFM, and, ironically, neither did TI staff.
What an amusing campaign that was!
You are fundamentally confused.
Glenn Greenwald is a founding editor of The Intercept, but he is not an owner, a managing editor, executive editor, one of the reporters on this story, etc.
His role here, now, is as a columnist.
Indeed, there is no reason to believe that he had any particular knowledge of this piece before its publication.
Complaints about this piece should be directed to the incompetents who investigated, wrote and published it and to the editor s who supervised them.
The contact info for the reporters is just above.
The Intercept is almost as bad at running comments software as it is at OpSec.
Thank you, Alexander; well said, and thank you for taking the time to put in a thoughtful opinion.
Last week I made a modest contribution to this endeavor of The Intercept to expose deep state shenanigans, and I fear that they have just played into the hands of the info war manipulators.
I know that the Russians are no angels, but there has to be some context to a story like this, even IF it is true.
Headlines, hits, disappointments due The Intercept… By the way, at least one former Intercept writer is being targeted by the government for his journalism.
He was reporting on a protest in Washington at the inauguration.
The government charged him with various offenses SIMPLY FOR BEING PRESENT.
Yes, some very creepy and completely inconsistent with the First Amendment prosecutions of reporters have been occurring as of late.
Its funny how mindless drones tend to believe everything their fed.
Then throw an alphabet in it and these same fools slop it up.
That MoA piece is mostly horseshit.
It was incompetence, not a conscious, motivated act.
What have you, at TI done to defend the girl you set up in this disgusting charade????
Pardon me for not proof reading that and the stuttered words on that post.
They are laying the groundwork for a media frenzy to con the people into thinking war in Syria, with Syria, Iran, Russia, or all three, is justified.
It makes no sense other than to lend credibility to the meaningless documents by shooting them through TI.
This report actually has no new information.
The phishing sounds nonsensical: Why would the Russian state send emails to only 100 of tens of thousands of local election officials, who likely had no easy, direct access to ballots?
That only one account was compromised is laughably insignificant.
This is probably a try by a leaker with verified hatred of Pres.
Punish her to the fullest extent of the law for her treason and do the same to any other leaker caught.
Is this the same Russian that shot down the airliner and invaded the Ukraine?
Go where you belong from now oninto the dustbin of history!
This young lady is an exception to this, apparently.
What made her suppose that the NSA would otherwise brush it aside, bury it or diminish its importance or relevance supposing it has any validity at all?
Snowden had reason to believe the NSA would never reveal the truths he knew, but this young lady has no such basis for believing any such thing about this.
Sure 2 was because the intelligence community is so reluctant to accuse Russia of anything without clear evidence, right?
And, of course, the spooks are known for their peace promotion and always doing things regardless of their own interests, as well as being scrupulous truth-tellers.
Exactly — the accusations and implications of Russian collusion have been unhesitant and unprofessionally petulant for months; what made her assume those in the Intelligence agency keen on promoting this disturbing charade would suddenly be discrete?
It makes no sense, especially as the report is geared precisely to be the propaganda it so obviously is.
Notice that now CNN ugh!
Just like fucking Iraq.
Just like fucking Vietnam.
Two things very suspicious.
I get to give my considered opinion on the subject.
It's an uncontroversial truth arrived at by the simplest logic.
I was laughing because I found click here all a https://gothailand.info/roulette/roulette-online-wizard-of-odds.html funny, to be honest.
Such logic, such perfection, here and now before my bedazzled eyes.
I can but stand in awe.
Yes, I can see how 1 is another thing to have suspicions about, and 2 is peculiar indeed.
And Reality Winner teaches yoga and rescues sick puppies.
Definitely points worthy of consideration.
Just in time for a tidy little war with Russia in Syria.
WHAT — THE — FUCK, Intercept?!
The article I read about this on the MSNBC web site says she got caught because she was communicating with reporters on government computers, what kind of intelligence analyst is she without any intelligence just like these asshole reporters?
Ryan Grim am looking at you.
Both communications were via her GMail account.
The kind of operational security measure necessary for safe communication with the outside world would not have been part of her daily routine.
Now, the reporters and editors at The Intercept, on the other hand.
What I find most upsetting is that this time it is The Intercept sullying their reputation by peddling such nonsense.
Is there any implied connection between this report and what happened in the election?
So… why is this interesting?
The Russians are not the only ones interested in who is President.
Sounds like Julian says you guys fucked up and bad.
Going totally against the grain here…not looking good for your own credibility…esp in light of hey you got any secrets, nothing to fear here….
Why should children be afraid of that?
Everybody knows that since global warming really started kicking he relocated his entire North Pole operation just south of Murmansk.
You at the Intercept should be ashamed.
Whatever happened to protecting you sources.
What is happening to Reality Winner is on you.
Democracy dies in darkness.
This girl probably got paid to release this.
The intercept should change their name to the Hillarycept.
Like trump and the Republicans.
Trump lying and saying ISIS is part of Iran and not SA.
Hypocrites and liars is what the republican voters are.
Trump just read the speech someone gave him.
So he might not be lying.
Your statement about the republicans is also true of the democrats.
The only difference is the rhetoric they use.
Not a real Top Secret document.
No science or facts here.
This is sad lies paid for by Democrats.
I happened to be first to post and by good fortune, we have a timeline on click the following article the appearance of this article June 5 2017, 11:44 a.
And the timing of the whole thing stinks to high heaven.
And this increasingly pitiful website gobbles it up and dutifully pukes it back out.
The narrative arc about Russia has gotten more shrill with each leak.
And you are right—when it seemed that the story was not dominating the media at least, then a new worse revelation to keep the story going.
And this whole propaganda campaign is very much identical to what Bush waged to accept an invasion of Iraq.
The Intercept was had by the deep state for sure.
You would that that with how hard they have pushed the Russia narrative that they would be besides themselves with a leak like this.
Instead they were incredibly mum and they even seem to be talking more about the woman who leaked the documents rather than the documents themselves.
These are unique and bloody human species!
This is not real.
This is not a real Top Secret document.
There is no science or fact to it.
This is hysterical that people believe this stuff.
Did the Clinton foundation pay for this???
Buwhaaaa While I feel a bit sorry for this silly girl, people need to stop calling her a whistle-blower.
She released superficial information that works in favor of the intelligence community and their endless Russian indoctrination.
The less trusting among us might go so far as suspecting them of intentionally getting it leaked.
Her motivation was supposedly her hatred of Trump.
If that were true and really, what else here could have driven her to this degree?
I have sympathy for anyone caught in the treacherous web of the deep state, but this whole affair is BS from top to bottom and sideways, too.
Her motivation was supposedly her hatred of Trump.
If that were true and really, what else here could have driven her to this degree?
You can learn a lot about this kid with a little online research, already.
The Web is filling up with stories about her.
After reading some of her bizarre tweets I find it curious that she had security clearance.
The whole affair is odd—fishy, shall we say.
Or was it the Kentucky Derby?
Came in third, I believe.


WATER BALLOON ROULETTE CHALLENGE


240 241 242 243 244

These patches will have been diverted from legal medical prescriptions. He told the Bailiwick Express that fentanyl manufacturers have altered ...


COMMENTS:


11.05.2020 in 00:10 Telkis:

You commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



13.05.2020 in 06:30 Kamuro:

So will not go.



13.05.2020 in 15:33 Jutilar:

I regret, that I can not participate in discussion now. I do not own the necessary information. But with pleasure I will watch this theme.



12.05.2020 in 05:17 Zulkidal:

In it something is. Earlier I thought differently, thanks for the help in this question.



15.05.2020 in 10:52 Mujar:

And other variant is?



16.05.2020 in 11:59 Vijar:

I apologise, I can help nothing, but it is assured, that to you will help to find the correct decision. Do not despair.



15.05.2020 in 06:12 Mijind:

In my opinion you are not right. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



09.05.2020 in 03:52 Dourg:

Yes, really. And I have faced it.



14.05.2020 in 07:26 Meztigore:

I join. And I have faced it. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.



12.05.2020 in 23:30 Kagak:

So happens. We can communicate on this theme.



12.05.2020 in 20:48 Goltiktilar:

Completely I share your opinion. It is excellent idea. It is ready to support you.



12.05.2020 in 19:25 Tagami:

I do not believe.



11.05.2020 in 08:22 Bajin:

Anything.



10.05.2020 in 05:24 Tygorisar:

Quite right! Idea excellent, I support.



08.05.2020 in 16:49 Daizragore:

Bravo, what phrase..., a remarkable idea



08.05.2020 in 00:09 Nerr:

In it something is and it is good idea. It is ready to support you.



07.05.2020 in 07:52 Samushura:

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.



15.05.2020 in 21:29 Taugar:

What words... super, an excellent idea



11.05.2020 in 02:38 Kekinos:

Really and as I have not guessed earlier



09.05.2020 in 11:44 Vokus:

I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.



09.05.2020 in 21:28 Mir:

What good interlocutors :)



15.05.2020 in 07:28 Jular:

The authoritative point of view, curiously..



13.05.2020 in 02:59 Mezizuru:

Willingly I accept. An interesting theme, I will take part. Together we can come to a right answer.



13.05.2020 in 05:36 Mijinn:

This magnificent idea is necessary just by the way



16.05.2020 in 06:02 Faejora:

Shame and shame!



14.05.2020 in 06:48 Faurisar:

Between us speaking, it is obvious. I suggest you to try to look in google.com



14.05.2020 in 12:18 Vudolkis:

Completely I share your opinion. Idea excellent, I support.



10.05.2020 in 10:58 Dolkis:

In it something is. Clearly, I thank for the help in this question.




Total 28 comments.